If this is a template Press Submit first

General Document Analysis

Documents
Templates
History

Help
REs
Training

FAA History Analysis

This template performs detailed analysis of the FAA history using search criteria defined, saved, and exchanged by you. Think of it as a search engine on steroids that analyzes any document so it can be clearly written, read, and understood. The FAA history document came from the FAA external website and was converted to a single text document. It is located in the directory structure of this tool at C:\z-cassbeth\gda\documents. Enjoy...

ReStart Default Rules No Rules

Prior to uploading your file, set your report options.
Also check the rules and modify them as desired.

      Stop Now

This tool is a broad document mining tool.
It can be used on any document

1. select browse, go to z-cassbeth/gda/documents
2. pick any.txt document
3. select a service and a rule, press submit
4. go thru each service and rule one at a time
5. select browse, pick another document
6. compare the results
7. update and create new rules and templates

. . . These template instructions are user defined.

Sustainable Development Possible with Creative System Engineering buy from amazon.com
Book Information
Previously Uploaded File: all-history.txt

Analysis Settings Hide Report Areas Hide
Analysis Results
Accessed Words
Accessed Patterns
Metrics

Doc Shape
Reading Level
Comments

Services and Rules

Template Comments FAA History Analysis

General Search Show Search Show Simple Rules Show Complex Rules
. . .
Search

Access Object

Find Duplicate Objects
Profile Document
Topics of Interest Show Search Show Simple Rules Show Complex Rules
. . .
Automation Computer Install SAGE STARS
Software NAFEC Research AAS Beacon RADAR
Hijack Restricted Areas ADIZ Air Defense Terrorist
NAS Stage A Curtis Report Design Competition Startup Shutdown

Decades
Organizations
Overall Reaction
Approach
FAA Systems Services Show Search Show Simple Rules Show Complex Rules
. . .
Terminal TRACON En Route Tower RADIO
Navigation RADAR ADS Satellite Multilateration
Oceanic Voice Communications Flow Control Early Automation
Advanced Automation Flight Service Weather Simulation Training Manual System

Predecessors

Add New Service Name Remove Last Service: Predecessors


Analysis Results Hide

Filter case sensitive
Access Object Reject Object Access Risk

Show Comment Details Hide All Comments Hide Checked Items Save Results . File

Processing previously uploaded file in all-history.txt

1. GDA-741 Jun 30, 1960: The House Committee on Science and Astronautics recommended that Congress support a Federal program for the development of a commercial supersonic transport (SST). The committee report called for completion of the B-70 bomber program, which it considered justified on defense grounds and which was expected to blaze a technological trail for the SST. The report also recommended that NASA assume leadership in devising a program for SST development. (See Jan 9, 1961.) .

2. GDA-765 Jan 9, 1961: The Federal Aviation Agency released a report on the commercial supersonic transport (SST), prepared by FAA with the assistance of DOD and NASA. The report concluded that a Mach 3 (2,000 m.p.h.) transport could and should be built by U.S. industry, with governmental financial support limited to demonstrated needs. Although he had been unable to persuade the outgoing Eisenhower Administration to request funds for SST development, Administrator Quesada recommended prompt and careful consideration of the immediate establishment of such a program. (See Jun 30, 1960, and Jul 24, 1961.) .

3. GDA-805 Jul 24, 1961: A joint FAA-DOD-NASA Commercial Supersonic Transport Aircraft Report was issued. Based on a review of information gathered from industry and Federal government sources, the report concluded that development of a commercial transport aircraft to fly three times the speed of sound (Mach 3) was feasible and could be done by 1970-71. During August, Congress made its first appropriation for FAA research on the Supersonic Transport (SST). (See Jan 9 and Sep 25, 1961.) .

4. GDA-818 Sep 25, 1961: FAA, NASA, and the Defense Department agreed on a plan for the research and study phase of the commercial supersonic transport (SST) program. Assigning FAA responsibility for overall program leadership and management direction, the plan provided for a Supersonic Transport Steering Group--headed by the FAA Administrator and including the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Materiel and NASA's Director of Advanced Research Programs--to formulate broad policy and give overall guidance for the Federal role in the program. The Steering Group would be supported on the working level by the SST task group, which had been in operation for some time. Comprised of designated FAA-DOD-NASA representatives, the task group was to continue coordinating the SST activities of the three agencies. (See Jul 24 and Dec 11, 1961.) .

5. GDA-824 Dec 11, 1961: A Supersonic Transport Advisory Group established in November held its first formal meeting with the joint Supersonic Transport Steering Group. The new group was headed by General Orval R. Cook (USAF Ret.) and included aviation industry leaders. Its major tasks were: to assess basic technical background material of the supersonic transport (SST); to define Federal-industry roles in program management; to consider the impact on U.S. and world markets if a European Mach 2 SST flew before the American SST; to develop a plan for financing development; to prepare a blueprint for development, production, and entry into airline service; and to consider methods for airline financing of SST purchases. (See Sep 25, 1961, and Jan 16, 1963.) .

6. GDA-865 Jan 16, 1963: The Federal Aviation Agency's Supersonic Transport Advisory Group recommended U.S. development of a commercial supersonic transport (SST) as a top-priority Federal-industry program in a report made public this date. In acknowledging the report, Administrator Halaby said that it made a "powerful" case for proceeding with SST development, but he asked for additional conclusions and recommendations in the following areas: cost of development and testing up to the preproduction stage for each airplane; unit cost which should be charged to the air carriers by manufacturers after the production stage was reached, "assuming production of some 200 aircraft"; direct operating costs; and management organization for development of an SST. The group submitted this supplementary report in May 1963 before dissolving in July. At the end May 1963, a Cabinet-level committee headed by Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson submitted recommendations to President Kennedy that were favorable to the program. (See Dec 11, 1961, and Jun 5, 1963.) .

7. GDA-880 Jun 5, 1963: President Kennedy announced his decision to proceed with the development of a U.S. supersonic transport (SST) in an address at the Air Force Academy's commencement exercises. In a Jun 14 letter to Congress, Kennedy wrote that the national interest required a U.S. SST superior to any comparable transport, and he formally recommended a program to develop such an aircraft. He suggested that private industry bear 25 percent of the development costs, with the Federal government paying the remaining 75 percent. To provide this Federal share, the President on Jun 24 requested Congress to appropriate $60 million. The money was subsequently included in FAA's appropriation for fiscal 1964. (See Jan 16, 1963, and Jul 29, 1963.) Jun 5, 1963: Administrator Halaby announced the establishment of an aviation mechanic safety awards program, to be administered by FAA in conjunction with the Flight Safety Foundation of New York City. Under the program, annual awards would honor airline and general aviation mechanics at state, regional, and national levels on the basis of their suggestions for improving either maintenance procedures or the mechanical reliability of aircraft and component systems. State aviation officials and representatives of FAA and industry would select the winners at the state and regional levels. FAA, the Flight Safety Foundation, and a committee of prominent members of the aviation community would select national winners. .

8. GDA-886 Jul 29, 1963: FAA Administrator Halaby announced the appointment of Gordon M. Bain to the new position of Deputy Administrator for Supersonic Transport Development. Bain was to head the organization within the FAA charged with overall responsibility for the Federal-industry program to develop a commercial supersonic transport (SST) aircraft. A division-level organization had previously handled the agency's role in the feasibility and research phase of the program, which was conducted jointly with NASA and the Defense Department. (See Jun 5, 1963, Aug 15, 1963, and Sep 15, 1965.) .

9. GDA-888 Aug 15, 1963: FAA issued a request for proposals (RFP) that established performance objectives for the United States supersonic transport (SST), providing the basis for design competition among airframe and engine manufacturers. The program timetable called for initial submission of manufacturers' designs based on this RFP by Jan 15, 1964. By Sep 10, 1963, three major airframe manufacturers and three major engine builders had notified FAA of their intention to submit proposals. (See Jul 29, 1963, and Nov 19, 1963.) .

10. GDA-896 Nov 19, 1963: Responding to requests from U.S. and foreign carriers for priority deliveries of the U.S. supersonic transport (SST) when it became available, FAA established a delivery priorities system for the first 70 airliners to come off the production line. The agency stated it was acting as intermediary for the airlines pending final selection of a manufacturer to make the SST available at an early time to the broadest possible market, while maintaining a reasonable balance of distribution been U.S. and foreign carriers. (See Aug 15, 1963, and Jan 15, 1964.) .

11. GDA-908 Jan 15, 1964: Six companies submitted supersonic transport (SST) design proposals to FAA in response to the agency’s Aug 1963 request for such proposals. The companies included three airframe manufacturers (Boeing, Lockheed, and North American Aviation) and three engine manufacturers (General Electric, Pratt & Whitney, and Curtiss-Wright). (See Nov 19, 1963, and Apr 1, 1964.) .

12. GDA-911 Feb 3, 1964: A series of sonic boom studies began as FAA launched a six-month project to test public reaction to the phenomenon in Oklahoma City, using regularly scheduled overflights by Air Force supersonic jets. On Aug 5, the National Academy of Sciences announced the establishment of a committee to study effects of sonic boom as related to the development of the supersonic transport. On Nov 18, FAA launched a three-month study of the effects of sonic boom on typical structures in White Sands, N.M. (See Jan 27, 1965.) .

13. GDA-915 Apr 1, 1964: Executive Order 11149 established the President's Advisory Committee on Supersonic Transport (SST) to advise President Lyndon B. Johnson on "all aspects of the supersonic transport program." The committee's original membership included Defense Secretary Robert S. McNamara (chairman), Treasury Secretary C. Douglas Dillon, Commerce Secretary Luther H. Hodges, NASA Administrator James E. Webb, FAA Administrator N. E. Halaby, CIA Director John A. McCone, and two private citizens: Eugene R. Black, former president of the World Bank, and Stanley de J. Osborne, Chairman of the Board of Olin Mathieson. The committee remained in existence until Sep 5, 1968, when it was terminated by the President. Also on Apr 1, 1964, FAA’s Deputy Administrator for SST Development Gordon Bain reported on the results of a evaluation made in Phase I of the SST design competition. A 210-person Federal team gave the highest competitive scores to the Boeing variable-sweep wing airframe design and the General Electric after-burning turbojet engine design. In transmitting these results to Administrator Halaby, Bain recommended that the two companies be selected to go into a one-year noncompetitive detailed-design phase. (See Jan 15 and May 20, 1964.) .

14. GDA-921 May 20, 1964: President Johnson gave his approval for the U.S. supersonic transport (SST) development program to proceed into Phase IIA--a six-month design competition between two airframe manufacturers (Boeing and Lockheed) and two engine manufacturers (General Electric and Pratt & Whitney). The President based his decision on the recommendations of the President's Advisory Committee on Supersonic Transport made on May 15, 1964. On Jun 1, the four competitors signed the six- month Phase IIA contracts. The contracts authorized each air frame manufacturer to spend at the rate of $1 million per month during the contract period and each engine manufacturer at a rate of $835,000 per month. All four manufacturers agreed to bear 25 percent of the contract costs. The design competition was subsequently extended for an additional six month period designated Phase IIB. (See Apr 1, 1964, and Jul 1, 1965.) Jun 1, 1964: La Guardia Airport opened to scheduled air carrier jet operations. Jet air carriers had begun operating at John F. Kennedy International Airport on Oct 4, 1958, and at Newark Airport on Sep 11, 1961. (See Apr 24, 1966.) .

15. GDA-922 Jun 1, 1964: The French-Anglo-United States Supersonic Transport (FAUSST) group opened its first meeting. The group was established to exchange information on airworthiness and environmental matters in SST development, certification, and operation. FAA represented the United States in the group. .

16. GDA-931 Sep 21, 1964: The Air Force XB-70A supersonic aircraft made its first flight. Subsequent flights of this steel-bodied airplane, which had been conceived as a bomber but recast as a research aircraft, provided the FAA-managed U.S. supersonic transport development program with useful technical data. (See Jun 8, 1966.) .

17. GDA-958 Jan 27, 1965: The National Academy of Sciences’ Committee on Supersonic Transport Sonic Boom concluded that prototype development of a supersonic transport (SST) was “clearly warranted” by evidence from research, tests, and studies of sonic boom phenomena (see Jul 1, 1965). This finding was largely based on data collected by FAA in the Oklahoma City area (see Feb 3, 1964). On Apr 25, 1965, FAA made public a summary of its Oklahoma City sonic boom study, in which U.S. Air Force jets had subjected residents to 1,253 booms during daylight hours. Most boom intensities ranged between 1.0 and 2.0 pounds of overpressure per square foot, but adverse atmospheric influences caused approximately 11 percent to exceed the intended limit of 2.0 pounds of overpressure. FAA also released an interim report on the related test at White Sands, N.M., in which Air Force jets subjected 16 representative structures to 1,494 booms varying in intensity from 2.0 to 20.0 pounds of overpressure. The findings of the two tests included: * Sonic booms of less than 5 pounds of overpressure caused no discernible damage to structurally sound buildings; however, booms of this intensity probably triggered cracks in faultily constructed walls, breaks in cracked windows, and other damage in structurally unsound buildings. * Booms of the order of those expected to be generated by the U.S. supersonic transport (SST) had no measurable physiological effect on humans. * The subjective reaction of individuals to sonic boom would be the area of greatest concern for the U.S. SST program. * Fully 27 percent of the people polled in the Oklahoma City area during the closing weeks of testing declared they could not live with sonic boom; additionally, 40 percent of those polled were unconvinced that booms did not cause damage to buildings. .

18. GDA-959 In releasing the information, Administrator Halaby stated his conclusion that a supersonic transport could be designed in terms of configuration, operating attitude, and flight paths so as to achieve public acceptance in the early 1970s. On Mar 8, 1969, the Federal government lost its appeal in a class action suit involving claims for property damage allegedly caused by the Oklahoma City tests. (See Apr 27, 1973.) .

19. GDA-968 Apr 6, 1965: The British government disclosed it had abandoned the TSR-2 tactical-strike- reconnaissance jet program. The Ministry of Defence stated that the program’s cost "was out of all proportion to the aircraft's military value." The loss of technical experience resulting from this decision was perceived as a setback for development of the supersonic transport Concorde (see Dec 11, 1967). .

20. GDA-994 Jul 1, 1965: General William F. McKee (USAF, Ret.) became the third FAA Administrator, succeeding Najeeb E. Halaby (see Mar 3, 1961). President Johnson had announced his selection of McKee on Apr 27, but did not submit his name for Senate confirmation until Congress passed special legislation exempting the general from a provision of the Federal Aviation Act that required the Administrator to be a civilian. This legislation cleared Congress on Jun 22, after prolonged debate. Johnson formally nominated McKee on Jun 23, and the Senate confirmed the nomination on Jun 30. Born in Chilhowie, Va., in 1906, "Bozo" McKee graduated from West Point in 1929. He began his career with the U.S. Army Coast Artillery Corps, but transferred in 1942 to the Army Air Forces. McKee received his first star in 1945. The following year, he was appointed Chief of Staff of the Air Transport Command. In 1947, when the Air Force became a separate service, McKee became Assistant Vice Chief of Staff, Air Force, a position held for six years. He was serving as Commander of the Air Force Logistics Command when selected for the Vice Chief of Staff post, the second highest military position in the Air Force. At the time he received his fourth star, he was the only Air Force officer to have attained that rank without holding an aeronautical rating. Upon his retirement from the military in 1964, he joined the National Aeronautics and Space Administration as Assistant Administrator for Management Development. The selection of McKee to head FAA was linked to the need for an experienced executive to oversee the development of the U.S. supersonic transport (see Jul 1, 1965, entry on this topic, below). He served as Administrator for three years and one month (see Jul 31, 1968). .

21. GDA-996 Jul 1, 1965: President Johnson announced that the supersonic transport (SST) development program would move into Phase IIC, an 18-month detailed design phase costing approximately $220 million. The President’s decision, which was made known during General William F. McKee's swearing-in as FAA Administrator, was based on the recommendations of the President's Advisory Committee on Supersonic Transport. The decision postponed prototype development and fabrication for at least 18 months, prolonging the program's competitive phase by retaining the two airframe competitors (Boeing and Lockheed) and the two engine competitors (General Electric and Pratt & Whitney) selected in 1964. Unlike the previous design phases, however, Phase IIC was not purely a "paper" competition. The airframe manufacturers would construct full-scale mock-ups, and the engine manufacturers would build and test full-scale demonstrator engines. The President enumerated four primary objectives of the new competitive design phase: (1) to provide a sound foundation for realistic estimates of operating performance and production costs; (2) to take advantage of the flight experience of the SR-71, the XB-70, and the variable swept-wing F-111; (3) to reduce developmental risks and developmental costs, while retaining the capacity to accelerate the program in its later phases; (4) and to provide a better basis for judgment as to the manner in which the program should proceed after the 18-month period. The President asked Congress for $140 million to initiate the 18-month program. (See May 20, 1964, and Dec 31, 1966.) .

22. GDA-1009 Sep 15, 1965: Deputy Administrator for Supersonic Transport Development Gordon Bain resigned from FAA effective this date. Brig. Gen. Jewell C. Maxwell (USAF) was assigned to replace Bain with the new title Director of Supersonic Transport Development. The new designation entailed no change in responsibilities or organizational relationship. (See Jul 29, 1963, and Apr 6, 1970.) .

23. GDA-1075 Dec 31, 1966: FAA declared the Boeing Company and the General Electric Company winners of the supersonic transport (SST) development program competitive design and study phase (Phase IIC). The agency selected Boeing's variable-sweep-wing airframe design over the Lockheed Corporation's double-delta-wing design and General Electric's after-burning turbojet engine over the Pratt & Whitney ductburning turbofan engine. The selections were based on an intensive two-month evaluation conducted by a 240-person team of aeronautical experts from the Defense Department, NASA, CAB, and FAA. In addition, 10 U.S. and foreign airlines independently evaluated the proposals and submitted individual recommendations. (See Jul 1, 1965, and Feb 6, 1967.) .

24. GDA-1084 Feb 6, 1967: FAA asked U.S. air carriers to help finance the supersonic transport (SST) prototype program by contributing $1 million in risk capital for each SST delivery position held (see Nov 19, 1963). The agency took the step at the direction of President Johnson, who considered it a way in which the airlines could demonstrate to the Congress and the public their faith in the SST program. Under the proposal, contributions would in no way affect the established places of contributing and noncontributing carriers on the reservation schedule. The money would go directly to the Boeing Company to be used in the development program in lieu of Federal funds. The airlines would recover their investment--up to a maximum of $1.5 million for each $1 million contributed--through aircraft royalty payments. Ten U.S. air carriers holding a total of 52 delivery positions agreed to put up risk capital. Details of the participation agreement could not be worked out before April, however, and this became a factor in delaying the President's announcement of his decision to take the SST program into prototype development. (See Dec 31, 1966, and Apr 29, 1967.) .

25. GDA-1088 Mar 25, 1967: The management of the XB-70 supersonic aircraft research program was transferred from the U.S. Air Force to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Flight Research Center. The program, much of which was devoted to the study of supersonic flight in support of the U.S. supersonic transport development program, continued as a joint NASA-USAF effort. (See Sep 21, 1964, Jun 8, 1966, and Feb 4, 1969.) .

26. GDA-1097 Apr 29, 1967: President Johnson announced that the U.S. supersonic transport (SST) development program would proceed into the prototype development phase (Phase III). Johnson based his decision on the recommendations of the President's Advisory Committee on Supersonic Transport. On May 1, 1967, the date of the President's formal approval, FAA, Boeing, and General Electric signed the Phase III contracts retroactive to Jan 1, 1967, which called for the construction of two identical variable, sweep-wing SST prototypes. (See Feb 6 and Jun 5, 1967.) .

27. GDA-1100 Jun 5, 1967: The Boeing Company assumed from FAA responsibility for allocating supersonic transport (SST) delivery positions to purchasers (see Nov 19, 1963). At the same time, FAA raised the cost of reserving future positions from $200,000 to $750,000. The $750,000 deposit would be made directly to Boeing, would be in the form of risk capital, and would bear no interest. It would be used by Boeing in lieu of Federal funds to help finance the prototype program. Boeing agreed to honor the 113 delivery positions already allocated by FAA among 26 airlines. (See Apr 29, 1967, and Jan 15, 1968.) .

28. GDA-1131 Dec 11, 1967: Sud Aviation and the British Aircraft Corporation unveiled a prototype of the British- French Concorde, the West's first supersonic transport, in Toulouse, France. On Mar 2, 1969, the Concorde made its first flight. Almost ten years later, on Sep 21, 1979, after meeting in London, aviation officials of France and the United Kingdom agreed to end the unprofitable Concorde production program. Unsold Concordes were allocated to the flag carriers of the two countries--Air France and British Airways. Only sixteen of the supersonic jet transports had been built. .

29. GDA-1136 Jan 15, 1968: AN FAA technical team began a review of modifications made by Boeing to its supersonic transport (SST) prototype design (variable-sweep-wing model 2707-200). The team found that these changes, by increasing the aircraft's weight, had resulted in a poor weight-payload ratio. This overweight factor limited range and payload to such an extent that the prototype's calculated performance fell well below the specifications for the Phase III contract. (With a full payload, the 2707-200 had a range of only 2,775 statute miles.) An amendment to the Phase III contract, dated Mar 29, 1968, required Boeing to submit to FAA by Jan 15, 1969, a fully substantiated design capable of meeting the Phase III contract criteria for the prototype airplane. (See Jun 5, 1967, and Oct 21, 1968.) .

30. GDA-1174 Oct 21, 1968: The Boeing Company formally announced it had abandoned its variable-sweep-wing design for the U.S. supersonic transport (SST) in favor of a conventional fixed-wing. The company’s engineers had never been able to overcome the weight penalties imposed by the variable-sweep wing design. Boeing would submit the new design to FAA for approval in Jan 1969. (See Jan 15, 1968, and Jan 15, 1969.) .

31. GDA-1185 Dec 31, 1968: The Soviet Union's Tupolev TU-144 prototype became the world's first supersonic transport to make its maiden flight. (See entry for Dec 11, 1967.) .

32. GDA-1191 Jan 15, 1969: The Boeing Company submitted to FAA for evaluation a new supersonic transport (SST) configuration, a delta-wing design with a horizontal tail. A 100-person review team drawn from FAA, NASA, and the Defense Department found that Boeing had adequately integrated the new design. In February, President Nixon appointed an interdepartmental committee headed by Under Secretary of Transportation James M. Beggs to review the SST program. The committee’s report, submitted in early April, contained mixed views on the program’s future. Secretary of Transportation Volpe, however, continued to advise in favor of the program. On Sep 23, 1969, Nixon announced that the SST development program would be continued because the project was essential to maintaining U.S. leadership in world air transport. The President requested Congress to appropriate $96 million during fiscal year 1970 ($662 million over a five- year period, fiscal 1970 through fiscal 1974) to pursue the program. (See Oct 21, 1968, and Apr 6, 1970.) .

33. GDA-1276 Apr 6, 1970: Management responsibility for the supersonic transport (SST) development program was transferred from the FAA to the Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation. The Director of Supersonic Transport Development would henceforth take guidance and direction from the Under Secretary of Transportation, while FAA would continue to provide a variety of support functions for the program. In announcing the transfer a few days earlier, Secretary Volpe had explained that it would increase his oversight of the program. In addition, the change would ensure that FAA, the agency responsible for certificating the aircraft, would not be responsible for its development. Volpe had also announced the appointment of William M. Magruder as Director of the program, succeeding Brig. Gen. Jewell C. Maxwell, who had resigned during the previous summer. (See Jan 15, 1969, and Apr 22, 1970.) .

34. GDA-1279 Apr 22, 1970: The first annual Earth Day observance throughout the United States included protests indicating environmentalists’ rising opposition to the supersonic transport (SST) program. Concerns about the SST included such issues as sonic booms (see Jan 27, 1965) and the aircraft’s effect on the ozone layer of the earth’s upper atmosphere. (See Apr 6 and Dec 30, 1970.) .

35. GDA-1334 Dec 3, 1970: The supersonic transport (SST) program suffered a reverse in Congress as the Senate adopted an amendment to delete from the Department of Transportation fiscal 1971 appropriations bill an administration request for $290 million to continue SST prototype development. Subsequently, House- Senate conferees restored $210 million of the administration's request to the bill. But the Senate balked again, and the House refused to take part in another conference. Accordingly, the two chambers passed a joint resolution continuing appropriations for the Department (including the SST project) through Mar 30, 1971, at the fiscal 1970 level; at the same time, they agreed to vote on the SST appropriation separately from the rest of the DOT appropriation early in the 92d Congress. (See Apr 22, 1970, and Mar 24, 1971.) .

36. GDA-1353 Mar 15, 1971: FAA adopted a marking and lighting standard for identifying transmission lines and their support structures that could constitute a potential hazard to air navigation. The standard called for three sequentially flashing white lights of high intensity to be installed on transmission line support structures. Each light would flash 60 times per minute. These lights replaced unlighted spherical markers on transmission lines, which provided little or no help to pilots at night or in bad weather. Mar 24, 1971: The Senate in effect terminated the U.S. civil supersonic transport (SST) program when it voted against the appropriation of $289 million to continue SST prototype development. The House of Representatives had voted down the SST appropriation on Mar 18, 1971. Later, in May 1971, pro-SST forces in the House seeking to revive the program succeeded by a vote of 201-197 in amending a Department of Transportation supplemental appropriations bill to include $85.3 million for SST development; however, the Senate struck out the amendment by a vote of 58-37. (See Dec 3, 1970, and Oct 12, 1971.) .

37. GDA-1391 Oct 12, 1971: FAA abolished the Office of Supersonic Transport Development and established the Supersonic Transport Office under the Associate Administrator for Engineering and Development to continue SST engineering and research activities. The agency also established a SST Contracts Branch in the Logistics Service to perform the contracting and procurement functions for the negotiation, administration, and termination of SST contracts. (See Mar 24, 1971.) .

38. GDA-1461 Apr 27, 1973: AN FAA rule imposing a virtual ban on civilian supersonic flights over the United States went into effect. The rule, first proposed on Apr 10, 1970, prohibited any operator of a civil aircraft from exceeding the speed of sound (Mach 1) when flying over the land mass or territorial waters of the United States, except when such operations would not cause a "measurable sonic boom overpressure to reach the surface." This wording left room for certain authorized operations at the lower end of the supersonic speed range. The rule was not seen as a bar to planned operations of the Anglo-French supersonic transport Concorde, which was expected to fly subsonic over U.S. territorial waters and mainland. (See Feb 4, 1976.) .

39. GDA-1467 Jun 3, 1973: The crash of a Tupolev TU-144 during a demonstration flight at the Paris Air Show dealt a serious blow to the Soviet supersonic transport program. (See Dec 31, 1968, and Dec 26, 1975.) .

40. GDA-1539 Jan 21, 1975: FAA announced that it would study the effects of high-altitude flight on the earth's atmosphere, building upon DOT's recently-ended Climatic Impact Assessment Program, which had begun in 1971 in response to concern about environmental consequences of the fleets of supersonic transports then anticipated. FAA's study, the High Altitude Pollution Program (HAPP), ended in 1982. Its final report, published in Jan 1984, concluded that the effects of civilian aircraft on ozone depletion and climactic change were not a cause of immediate concern at that time. .

41. GDA-1570 Jan 21, 1976: British Airways and Air France began the world's first scheduled supersonic passenger service (see Dec 26, 1975) with simultaneous takeoffs of Anglo-French Concorde SST aircraft from London and Paris for flights to Bahrain and Rio de Janeiro. The London-Bahrain flight, normally 6 hours 30 minutes by subsonic jet, took 4 hours 10 minutes. The Paris-Rio flight, scheduled to take 7 hours 5 minutes (compared with a subsonic time of 11 hours 10 minutes), arrived 40 minutes late. (See Feb 4, 1976.) .

42. GDA-1571 Feb 4, 1976: Secretary of Transportation William T. Coleman, Jr., announced his decision to permit the Anglo-French supersonic transport Concorde to land in the U.S. on a temporary, restricted basis. Air France and British Airways had made application in Jan 1975 to conduct limited commercial operations with the SST into New York Kennedy and Washington Dulles airports, proposing a maximum of four flights daily into Kennedy and two daily into Dulles. In an environmental impact statement issued in draft in Mar 1975 and in final on this date, FAA recommended granting the application on the grounds that the limited operations could not significantly harm the environment. Secretary Coleman authorized the proposed service for a trial period not to exceed 16 months. Working with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Office of the Secretary, FAA developed plans for noise, sonic boom, and low altitude pollution monitoring of the Concorde to determine its environmental impact during the trial period. Devices to monitor noise and emissions were installed at Washington Dulles and surrounding communities, and most were in operation when Concorde service to Dulles began on May 24, 1976. Intense opposition from environmental and citizen groups in the New York area and a ban by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey delayed Concorde service at Kennedy. (See Apr 27, 1973, Sep 23, 1977, and Oct 17, 1977) .

43. GDA-1582 May 5, 1976: The United States, France, and the United Kingdom concluded an agreement providing for the monitoring of ozone levels in the stratosphere and cooperation to ensure that the ozone layer was not degraded by emissions from supersonic transports. (See Feb 4, 1976, and Sep 23, 1977.) .

44. GDA-1639 Sep 23, 1977: At the end of the 16-month trial of the Anglo-French Concorde supersonic transport at Dulles International Airport (see Feb 4, 1976), Secretary of Transportation Brock Adams announced proposed permanent rules for civil supersonic transport (SST) operations in the United States. Most of these related to the new noise restrictions adopted in 1977. Secretary Adams proposed to exempt the 16 Concordes manufactured before Jan 1, 1980, from retrofit requirements for older jet transports (see Dec 23, 1976), while requiring future SST's to meet all noise standards for newer subsonic aircraft (see Mar 3, 1977). In view of the exceptional loudness of the Concorde, however, the ban on Concorde operations between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. was retained, as was the absolute prohibition on supersonic flight over land. In addition, the Concorde was granted permission to land at Washington, New York, and 11 other American cities. These proposed regulations became final on Jul 31, 1978, after several more public hearings on the subject. At that time, FAA justified its "grandfather clause" for the first 16 Concordes by noting that they constituted the entire production run of the aircraft. (Because of its high fuel costs and limited payload, the Concorde had been purchased only by the state airlines of France and Britain.) FAA felt that modifications that would bring these aircraft into compliance with subsonic noise standards were neither technologically practicable nor economically reasonable. On the other hand, some restrictions on the Concorde were justified by thorough analysis of FAA test results on the plane's loudness, which showed that the perceived noise generated by a Concorde on its takeoff path was double that of a Boeing 707, four times that of a Boeing 747, and eight times that of a DC-10. FAA also reviewed a number of environmental concerns that had been expressed about SSTs, the most important of which was the fear that emission from SST engines might damage the ozone layer of the earth's atmosphere (see May 5, 1976). Citing a number of recent research studies, including one submitted by the National Academy of Sciences, FAA concluded that the possibility of such damage from the Concordes was too small to be an immediate concern. .

45. GDA-1643 Oct 17, 1977: A U.S. Supreme Court decision ended the long dispute over landing rights for the Anglo-French Concorde supersonic transport at New York Kennedy airport. In 1976, Secretary of Transportation William T. Coleman had allowed a 16-month trial of the Concorde at Washington and New York (see Feb 4, 1976); however, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, operator of Kennedy airport, had banned the Concorde pending further study of its environmental impact. During the spring of 1977, citizens concerned about the Concorde's potential noise conducted demonstrations that included the deliberate snarling of automobile traffic by driving cars very slowly down Kennedy's access roads. Meanwhile, on May 11, 1977, a Federal District Court ruled that the Port Authority's landing ban was illegal because it was in "irreconcilable conflict" with Federal prerogatives. A month later, on Jun 14, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit modified this ruling, holding that the Port Authority had the right to establish "fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory" noise standards. The Court of appeals sent the case back to the District Court to determine whether the Port Authority's actions met the "fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory" test. On Aug 17, the District Court ruled that the Port Authority's long delay in formulating noise standards constituted unreasonable and discriminatory treatment of the Concorde. It was this decision that the Supreme Court upheld. Concorde passenger service from New York to London and Paris began on Nov 22, 1977. .

Processed Entire File


Accessed Words Hide

Filter Noise Words

Number Sort
425: the 191: of 151: and 141: to 106: a
98: in 80: for 72: on 69: supersonic 63: sst
63: transport 53: see 51: program 51: faa 46: that
41: development 41: was 38: by 28: at 28: us
27: had 27: would 27: jan 26: from 25: air
23: 1963 22: concorde 22: apr 21: an 21: with
21: 1 21: jun 20: 1964 20: new 20: design
20: phase 19: its 19: be 19: as 19: 15
19: boeing 18: administrator 18: which 18: aircraft 17: president
17: dec 17: this 15: secretary 15: jul 15: sep
14: 1967 14: flight 14: federal 14: his 14: it
13: 5 13: first 13: announced 13: million 13: 1970
13: mar 13: 1965 12: may 12: report 12: committee
12: feb 12: general 12: made 12: not 12: 1961
12: force 12: prototype 12: sonic 12: 1976 11: 1968
11: aviation 11: 1971 11: into 11: group 11: congress
11: he 11: boom 11: 11 11: manufacturers 11: two
10: 4 10: research 10: 3 10: decision 10: engine
10: were 10: 1977 10: during 9: national 9: united
9: study 9: 1969 9: johnson 9: york 9: noise
9: 6 9: 24 9: kennedy 9: transportation 8: included
8: states 8: over 8: department 8: 8: carriers
8: been 8: established 8: time 8: three 8: commercial
8: 21 8: operations 8: 27 8: 29 8: airframe
8: when 8: oct 8: environmental 8: service 8: could
7: nasa 7: presidents 7: such 7: 31 7: recommended
7: agency 7: senate 7: halaby 7: however 7: france
7: production 7: mckee 7: 10 7: 25 7: submitted
7: 16 7: became 7: based 7: nov 7: court
7: booms 6: city 6: electric 6: costs 6: these
6: also 6: port 6: advisory 6: but 6: public
6: aug 6: appropriation 6: no 6: management 6: fiscal
6: began 6: bain 6: company 6: 20 6: concluded
6: agreed 6: airlines 6: defense 6: percent 6: support
6: 30 6: recommendations 6: 1966 6: period 6: each
6: airport 6: jet 6: damage 6: month 6: 23
5: four 5: director 5: or 5: delivery 5: contracts
5: concordes 5: their 5: 19 5: team 5: british
5: competition 5: william 5: after 5: anglo-french 5: iii
5: 22 5: overpressure 5: hours 5: industry 5: test
5: 1975 5: impact 5: continue 5: take 5: contract
5: request 5: dulles 5: minutes 5: subsonic 5: administration
5: proposed 5: under 5: limited 5: oklahoma 5: ozone
5: proposals 4: government 4: position 4: all 4: before
4: lockheed 4: basis 4: times 4: meeting 4: structures
4: review 4: final 4: positions 4: area 4: later
4: trial 4: submit 4: cost 4: called 4: while
4: date 4: mach 4: selected 4: ban 4: early
4: per 4: responsibility 4: proceed 4: state 4: flights
4: land 4: 1973 4: washington 4: transports 4: end
4: competitive 4: house 4: reasonable 4: joint 4: whitney
4: pounds 4: effects 4: only 4: technical 4: sound
4: office 4: provide 4: concern 4: most 4: pratt
4: scheduled 4: about 4: standards 4: operating 4: effect
3: bill 3: chief 3: range 3: subsequently 3: paris
3: out 3: issued 3: direction 3: change 3: transmission
3: companies 3: held 3: competitors 3: adopted 3: manufacturer
3: formally 3: gordon 3: year 3: continued 3: should
3: holding 3: tests 3: results 3: headed 3: project
3: deputy 3: coleman 3: they 3: 18 3: usaf
3: help 3: jets 3: world 3: agencys 3: high
3: vote 3: caused 3: american 3: including 3: airways
3: future 3: sciences 3: safety 3: rule 3: other
3: aircrafts 3: years 3: major 3: e 3: risk
3: programs 3: c 3: foreign 3: volpe 3: 26
3: overall 3: space 3: f 3: stated 3: bear
3: vice 3: evaluation 3: asked 3: transferred 3: military
3: speed 3: studies 3: justified 3: layer 3: entry
3: authority 3: leadership 3: levels 3: immediate 3: white
3: airline 3: iic 3: conducted 3: payload 3: performance
3: approval 3: representatives 3: aeronautics 3: amendment 3: 8
3: buildings 3: because 3: intensity 3: establishment 3: federal-industry
3: civil 3: operation 3: 18-month 3: earths 3: academy
3: airplane 3: related 3: winners 3: 2 3: foundation
3: assistant 3: district 3: atmosphere 3: steering 3: civilian
3: authorized 3: appropriations 3: expected 3: m 3: 9
3: funds 3: authoritys 3: staff 3: information 3: develop
3: required 3: variable-sweep-wing 3: between 3: cause 3: plan
3: capital 3: provided 3: selection 3: some 3: 17
3: london 3: addition 3: faas 3: six 3: organization
2: used 2: concerns 2: 750000 2: highest 2: structurally
2: task 2: generated 2: 16-month 2: rate 2: april
2: launched 2: modifications 2: xb-70 2: command 2: requested
2: regional 2: honor 2: succeeding 2: following 2: waters
2: james 2: de 2: response 2: 12 2: who
2: gen 2: took 2: pending 2: allocated 2: passed
2: variable-sweep 2: determine 2: bomber 2: engines 2: role
2: maximum 2: grounds 2: retaining 2: constituted 2: factor
2: 1960 2: after-burning 2: worlds 2: awards 2: one
2: forces 2: wing 2: experience 2: functions 2: prototypes
2: begun 2: appointed 2: territorial 2: annual 2: exceed
2: testing 2: kingdom 2: opened 2: phases 2: level
2: months 2: star 2: contributing 2: officials 2: signed
2: found 2: down 2: soviet 2: adams 2: voted
2: 60 2: below 2: daily 2: ssts 2: ten
2: released 2: rfp 2: built 2: approximately 2: appointment
2: tupolev 2: ensure 2: international 2: among 2: passenger
2: stage 2: chairman 2: order 2: application 2: up
2: resigned 2: objectives 2: loudness 2: appropriate 2: restrictions
2: financing 2: consider 2: citizens 2: lyndon 2: nm
2: declared 2: same 2: working 2: money 2: r
2: nixon 2: weight 2: terminated 2: logistics 2: advise
2: full-scale 2: john 2: developmental 2: 200 2: directly
2: agreement 2: landing 2: jewell 2: providing 2: available
2: emissions 2: appeals 2: number 2: second 2: measurable
2: 7 2: variable 2: make 2: received 2: b
2: monitoring 2: additional 2: ruled 2: responsible 2: opposition
2: formal 2: engineering 2: lieu 2: jersey 2: favor
2: fully 2: gave 2: maintaining 2: charged 2: 40
2: way 2: ended 2: any 2: through 2: abandoned
2: aeronautical 2: ret 2: sands 2: fly 2: previous
2: head 2: faa-dod-nasa 2: operator 2: activities 2: committees
2: t 2: subjected 2: army 2: turbojet 2: finance
2: installed 2: 14 2: configuration 2: standard 2: tu-144
2: pollution 2: executive 2: lights 2: upon 2: designated
2: maxwell 2: considered 2: legislation 2: until 2: data
2: administrations 2: reaction 2: lines 2: case 2: potential
2: private 2: 2707-200 2: fair 2: guidance 2: six-month
2: interest 2: select 2: perceived 2: supreme 2: line
2: those 2: altitude 2: long 2: did 2: polled
2: brig 2: go 2: nondiscriminatory 1: countries--air 1: cooperation
1: reach 1: total 1: topic 1: iib 1: lower
1: va 1: achieve 1: careful 1: permit 1: reduce
1: superior 1: ductburning 1: contributed--through 1: matters 1: arrived
1: amending 1: mathieson 1: put 1: so 1: mixed
1: simultaneous 1: earlier 1: corps 1: observance 1: members
1: french 1: unsold 1: increasing 1: refused 1: purchases
1: view 1: treasury 1: weight-payload 1: square 1: establish
1: hand 1: north 1: engineers 1: capacity 1: outgoing
1: priority 1: cia 1: too 1: claims 1: ministry
1: monitor 1: spring 1: unions 1: day 1: contained
1: groups 1: programs--to 1: fleets 1: formulating 1: interdepartmental
1: faultily 1: experienced 1: 1958 1: happ 1: spherical
1: olin 1: specifications 1: night 1: low 1: cities
1: corporation 1: sources 1: luther 1: materiel 1: small
1: rights 1: loss 1: room 1: developed 1: include
1: effective 1: assistance 1: february 1: iia 1: upheld
1: conclusions 1: persuade 1: proposal 1: reserving 1: technological
1: back 1: brock 1: evaluated 1: dealt 1: unlike
1: transmitting 1: intensive 1: poor 1: 140 1: xb-70a
1: assess 1: wests 1: oversight 1: initiate 1: oversee
1: board 1: almost 1: supplementary 1: conventional 1: 75
1: give 1: criteria 1: penalties 1: policy 1: drawn
1: beggs 1: build 1: fell 1: estimates 1: path
1: rank 1: variety 1: flag 1: companys 1: light
1: meanwhile 1: original 1: douglas 1: assumed 1: upper
1: 2775 1: whether 1: delete 1: material 1: purchasers
1: nomination 1: citing 1: identifying 1: closing 1: preproduction
1: although 1: allowed 1: varying 1: felt 1: nasas
1: european 1: one-year 1: f-111 1: selections 1: market
1: said 1: act 1: walls 1: known 1: august
1: coordinating 1: part 1: jr 1: 1970-71 1: bozo
1: clause 1: chambers 1: permission 1: fuel 1: clearly
1: more 1: priorities 1: absolute 1: unreasonable 1: previously
1: 853 1: address 1: driving 1: represented 1: paris-rio
1: toulouse 1: maintenance 1: britain 1: older 1: retirement
1: quesada 1: right 1: termination 1: component 1: accordingly
1: branch 1: electrics 1: substantiated 1: able 1: using
1: little 1: additionally 1: series 1: revive 1: risks
1: mainland 1: resulted 1: pro-sst 1: commencement 1: attitude
1: recover 1: carrier 1: intention 1: compliance 1: deposit
1: lighting 1: joined 1: sixteen 1: struck 1: fixed-wing
1: protection 1: suggested 1: regulations 1: center 1: j
1: builders 1: off 1: views 1: certain 1: transfer
1: 1978 1: point 1: graduated 1: administered 1: 289
1: changes 1: tail 1: late 1: designation 1: notified
1: prolonging 1: background 1: releasing 1: 1947 1: consequences
1: exercises 1: announcement 1: bahrain 1: magruder 1: consideration
1: construction 1: surrounding 1: 240-person 1: tasks 1: exchange
1: n 1: terms 1: individuals 1: done 1: career
1: webb 1: double 1: osborne 1: sequentially 1: 1942
1: essential 1: pilots 1: french-anglo-united 1: atmospheric 1: takeoff
1: adverse 1: crash 1: 92d 1: responsibilities 1: 96
1: conceived 1: worked 1: officer 1: ruling 1: if
1: delta-wing 1: airworthiness 1: henceforth 1: sud 1: overcome
1: linked 1: deliberate 1: another 1: action 1: within
1: proceeding 1: three-month 1: harm 1: showed 1: largely
1: individual 1: depletion 1: initial 1: certificating 1: allocating
1: environmentalists 1: 1982 1: allegedly 1: detailed-design 1: actions
1: maiden 1: delay 1: intense 1: 210 1: demonstrated
1: serious 1: financial 1: flashing 1: abolished 1: faith
1: need 1: collected 1: interim 1: dispute 1: climactic
1: mass 1: automobile 1: suggestions 1: finding 1: dissolving
1: tactical-strike- 1: recent 1: spend 1: 290 1: 662
1: broad 1: la 1: 1974 1: rating 1: 707
1: unveiled 1: suffered 1: devoted 1: resulting 1: investment--up
1: protests 1: manner 1: 1253 1: existence 1: proposing
1: 210-person 1: recently-ended 1: proportion 1: defence 1: modified
1: supplemental 1: foot 1: requests 1: demonstrator 1: either
1: few 1: less 1: high-altitude 1: very 1: useful
1: met 1: limit 1: snarling 1: ranged 1: sweep-wing
1: commander 1: degraded 1: confirmation 1: curtiss-wright 1: post
1: needs 1: intensities 1: calculated 1: retained 1: eight
1: 747 1: timetable 1: already 1: perform 1: debate
1: irreconcilable 1: experts 1: regularly 1: feasibility 1: dc-10
1: slowly 1: basic 1: neither 1: prompt 1: extent
1: except 1: served 1: conjunction 1: succeeded 1: cracked
1: restored 1: remaining 1: airliners 1: advanced 1: third
1: wording 1: subject 1: july 1: greatest 1: have
1: evidence 1: announcing 1: wrote 1: assuming 1: improving
1: systems 1: economically 1: delaying 1: unable 1: contributions
1: people 1: granting 1: stratosphere 1: markets 1: orval
1: noncompetitive 1: move 1: purely 1: system 1: affect
1: dot 1: treatment 1: newer 1: well 1: fear
1: takeoffs 1: november 1: leaders 1: participation 1: show
1: discernible 1: left 1: disclosed 1: replaced 1: humans
1: class 1: paper 1: throughout 1: warranted 1: prolonged
1: environment 1: flew 1: summary 1: house- 1: possibility
1: replace 1: issues 1: bring 1: serving 1: blueprint
1: demonstration 1: division-level 1: subjective 1: independently 1: special
1: significantly 1: again 1: trail 1: artillery 1: 1980
1: mcnamara 1: planned 1: comprised 1: letter 1: property
1: cook 1: b-70 1: devices 1: unconvinced 1: powerful
1: mechanics 1: six- 1: realistic 1: schedule 1: delayed
1: cracks 1: expressed 1: 58-37 1: cab 1: exempting
1: reviewed 1: earth 1: coast 1: then 1: cabinet-level
1: typical 1: acknowledging 1: retroactive 1: continuing 1: circuit
1: 52 1: dod 1: supported 1: resolution 1: 1906
1: fabrication 1: hodges 1: prominent 1: least 1: analysis
1: sent 1: triggered 1: further 1: h 1: 1979
1: increase 1: balked 1: reliability 1: reconnaissance 1: mechanic
1: bank 1: form 1: 2000 1: setback 1: define
1: i 1: horizontal 1: phenomena 1: associate 1: top-priority
1: mechanical 1: areas 1: formulate 1: responding 1: discriminatory
1: anticipated 1: rising 1: meet 1: places 1: granted
1: payments 1: flying 1: against 1: climatic 1: blaze
1: jointly 1: acting 1: commerce 1: purchased 1: blow
1: reservation 1: pursue 1: 113 1: exceeding 1: suit
1: value 1: roads 1: handled 1: former 1: might
1: nor 1: indicating 1: astronautics 1: negotiation 1: paying
1: than 1: airports 1: intermediary 1: najeeb 1: frame
1: agencies 1: nominated 1: advantage 1: 1970s 1: normally
1: devising 1: swept-wing 1: appeal 1: primary 1: noncontributing
1: corporations 1: broadest 1: title 1: pm 1: imposing
1: effort 1: designed 1: possible 1: without 1: overflights
1: reported 1: designs 1: markers 1: communities 1: born
1: subsequent 1: run 1: acceptance 1: full 1: tsr-2
1: concerned 1: eugene 1: enumerated 1: published 1: windows
1: requirements 1: marking 1: findings 1: banned 1: days
1: extended 1: miles 1: statement 1: construct 1: academys
1: rules 1: iia--a 1: entire 1: double-delta-wing 1: surface
1: assume 1: manufactured 1: science 1: constitute 1: accelerate
1: unlighted 1: important 1: am 1: went 1: live
1: requiring 1: comparable 1: london-bahrain 1: hazard 1: draft
1: illegal 1: statute 1: identical 1: dated 1: robert
1: favorable 1: practicable 1: prerogatives 1: guardia 1: attained
1: membership 1: confirmed 1: representative 1: prohibited 1: completion
1: lost 1: details 1: restricted 1: remained 1: 1929
1: seeking 1: swearing-in 1: demonstrations 1: fourth 1: conference
1: direct 1: better 1: costing 1: emission 1: assigned
1: virtual 1: adequately 1: imposed 1: scores 1: residents
1: certification 1: traffic 1: bad 1: citizen 1: dots
1: postponed 1: methods 1: exempt 1: conflict 1: chilhowie
1: prepare 1: steel-bodied 1: come 1: procurement 1: step
1: building 1: share 1: gathered 1: name 1: five-
1: sr-71 1: retrofit 1: mock-ups 1: plans 1: prepared
1: feasible 1: daylight 1: judgment 1: capable 1: temporary
1: two-month 1: distribution 1: community 1: roles 1: grandfather
1: flash 1: unit 1: intended 1: relationship 1: model
1: influences 1: eisenhower 1: west 1: much 1: planes
1: bar 1: 1984 1: paths 1: faa-managed 1: 220
1: unsound 1: exceptional 1: 70 1: minute 1: weeks
1: integrated 1: demonstrate 1: s 1: physiological 1: 11149
1: newark 1: cleared 1: rest 1: balance 1: deliveries
1: group--headed 1: reached 1: recast 1: 201-197 1: ratio
1: unprofitable 1: probably 1: stanley 1: phenomenon 1: 835000
1: constructed 1: fausst 1: assessment 1: contracting 1: navigation
1: black 1: separate 1: organizational 1: conduct 1: 200000
1: seen 1: access 1: nasa-usaf 1: compared 1: 1494
1: summer 1: involving 1: assigning 1: thorough 1: dillon
1: hearings 1: separately 1: janeiro 1: rio 1: governmental
1: explained 1: conferees 1: never 1: procedures 1: 1945
1: mph 1: breaks 1: boeings 1: prohibition 1: conclusion
1: several 1: turbofan 1: british- 1: mccone 1: provision
1: noting 1: submission 1: royalty 1: detailed 1: reverse
1: cars 1: weather 1: 100-person 1: technologically 1: mckees
1: permanent 1: kennedys 1: aspects 1: raised 1: overweight
1: entailed

Accessed Unique Words: 1386

Alpha Sort
1: 100-person 7: 10 1: 11149 1: 113 11: 11
1: 1253 2: 12 1: 140 1: 1494 2: 14
19: 15 2: 16-month 7: 16 3: 17 3: 18-month
3: 18 1: 1906 1: 1929 1: 1942 1: 1945
1: 1947 1: 1958 2: 1960 12: 1961 23: 1963
20: 1964 13: 1965 6: 1966 14: 1967 11: 1968
9: 1969 1: 1970-71 13: 1970 1: 1970s 11: 1971
4: 1973 1: 1974 5: 1975 12: 1976 10: 1977
1: 1978 1: 1979 1: 1980 1: 1982 1: 1984
5: 19 21: 1 1: 200000 1: 2000 2: 200
1: 201-197 6: 20 1: 210-person 1: 210 8: 21
1: 220 5: 22 6: 23 1: 240-person 9: 24
7: 25 3: 26 2: 2707-200 1: 2775 8: 27
1: 289 1: 290 8: 29 3: 2 6: 30
7: 31 10: 3 2: 40 10: 4 1: 52
1: 58-37 13: 5 2: 60 1: 662 9: 6
1: 707 1: 70 1: 747 2: 750000 1: 75
2: 7 1: 835000 1: 853 3: 8 1: 92d
1: 96 3: 9 8: 106: a 2: abandoned
1: able 1: abolished 4: about 1: absolute 3: academy
1: academys 1: accelerate 1: acceptance 1: access 1: accordingly
1: achieve 1: acknowledging 1: act 1: acting 1: action
1: actions 2: activities 2: adams 3: addition 2: additional
1: additionally 1: address 1: adequately 1: administered 5: administration
2: administrations 18: administrator 3: adopted 1: advanced 1: advantage
1: adverse 2: advise 6: advisory 2: aeronautical 3: aeronautics
1: affect 2: after-burning 5: after 1: again 1: against
1: agencies 7: agency 3: agencys 6: agreed 2: agreement
25: air 18: aircraft 3: aircrafts 8: airframe 3: airline
1: airliners 6: airlines 3: airplane 6: airport 1: airports
3: airways 1: airworthiness 4: all 1: allegedly 2: allocated
1: allocating 1: allowed 1: almost 1: already 6: also
1: although 2: altitude 1: am 1: amending 3: amendment
3: american 2: among 21: an 1: analysis 151: and
5: anglo-french 13: announced 1: announcement 1: announcing 2: annual
1: another 1: anticipated 2: any 1: appeal 2: appeals
2: application 2: appointed 2: appointment 2: appropriate 6: appropriation
3: appropriations 3: approval 2: approximately 22: apr 2: april
4: area 1: areas 2: army 1: arrived 1: artillery
19: as 3: asked 1: aspects 1: assess 1: assessment
1: assigned 1: assigning 1: assistance 3: assistant 1: associate
1: assume 1: assumed 1: assuming 1: astronautics 28: at
3: atmosphere 1: atmospheric 1: attained 1: attitude 6: aug
1: august 3: authority 3: authoritys 3: authorized 1: automobile
2: available 11: aviation 2: awards 1: b-70 2: b
1: back 1: background 1: bad 1: bahrain 6: bain
1: balance 1: balked 4: ban 1: bank 1: banned
1: bar 7: based 1: basic 4: basis 19: be
3: bear 7: became 3: because 8: been 4: before
6: began 1: beggs 2: begun 2: below 1: better
3: between 3: bill 1: black 1: blaze 1: blow
1: blueprint 1: board 19: boeing 1: boeings 2: bomber
11: boom 7: booms 1: born 1: bozo 1: branch
1: breaks 2: brig 1: bring 1: britain 1: british-
5: british 1: broad 1: broadest 1: brock 1: build
1: builders 1: building 3: buildings 2: built 6: but
38: by 3: c 1: cab 1: cabinet-level 1: calculated
4: called 1: capable 1: capacity 3: capital 1: career
1: careful 1: carrier 8: carriers 1: cars 2: case
3: cause 3: caused 1: center 1: certain 1: certificating
1: certification 2: chairman 1: chambers 3: change 1: changes
2: charged 3: chief 1: chilhowie 1: cia 1: circuit
1: cities 1: citing 1: citizen 2: citizens 6: city
3: civil 3: civilian 1: claims 1: class 1: clause
1: cleared 1: clearly 1: climactic 1: climatic 1: closing
1: coast 3: coleman 1: collected 1: come 2: command
1: commander 1: commencement 1: commerce 8: commercial 12: committee
2: committees 1: communities 1: community 3: companies 6: company
1: companys 1: comparable 1: compared 5: competition 4: competitive
3: competitors 1: completion 1: compliance 1: component 1: comprised
1: conceived 4: concern 1: concerned 2: concerns 6: concluded
1: conclusion 1: conclusions 22: concorde 5: concordes 1: conduct
3: conducted 1: conferees 1: conference 2: configuration 1: confirmation
1: confirmed 1: conflict 11: congress 1: conjunction 1: consequences
2: consider 1: consideration 2: considered 1: constitute 2: constituted
1: construct 1: constructed 1: construction 1: contained 5: continue
3: continued 1: continuing 5: contract 1: contracting 5: contracts
1: contributed--through 2: contributing 1: contributions 1: conventional 1: cook
1: cooperation 1: coordinating 1: corporation 1: corporations 1: corps
4: cost 1: costing 6: costs 8: could 1: countries--air
7: court 1: cracked 1: cracks 1: crash 1: criteria
1: curtiss-wright 2: daily 6: damage 2: data 4: date
1: dated 1: day 1: daylight 1: days 1: dc-10
2: de 1: dealt 1: debate 17: dec 10: decision
2: declared 1: defence 6: defense 1: define 1: degraded
1: delay 1: delayed 1: delaying 1: delete 1: deliberate
1: deliveries 5: delivery 1: delta-wing 1: demonstrate 1: demonstrated
1: demonstration 1: demonstrations 1: demonstrator 8: department 1: depletion
1: deposit 3: deputy 20: design 2: designated 1: designation
1: designed 1: designs 1: detailed-design 1: detailed 1: details
2: determine 3: develop 1: developed 41: development 2: developmental
1: devices 1: devising 1: devoted 2: did 1: dillon
1: direct 3: direction 2: directly 5: director 1: discernible
1: disclosed 1: discriminatory 1: dispute 1: dissolving 1: distribution
3: district 1: division-level 1: dod 1: done 1: dot
1: dots 1: double-delta-wing 1: double 1: douglas 2: down
1: draft 1: drawn 1: driving 1: ductburning 5: dulles
10: during 3: e 6: each 1: earlier 4: early
1: earth 3: earths 1: economically 4: effect 1: effective
4: effects 1: effort 1: eight 1: eisenhower 1: either
6: electric 1: electrics 1: emission 2: emissions 4: end
2: ended 10: engine 2: engineering 1: engineers 2: engines
2: ensure 1: entailed 1: entire 3: entry 1: enumerated
1: environment 8: environmental 1: environmentalists 1: essential 1: establish
8: established 3: establishment 1: estimates 1: eugene 1: european
1: evaluated 3: evaluation 1: evidence 2: exceed 1: exceeding
1: except 1: exceptional 1: exchange 2: executive 1: exempt
1: exempting 1: exercises 1: existence 3: expected 2: experience
1: experienced 1: experts 1: explained 1: expressed 1: extended
1: extent 1: f-111 3: f 2: faa-dod-nasa 1: faa-managed
51: faa 3: faas 1: fabrication 2: factor 2: fair
1: faith 1: faultily 1: fausst 2: favor 1: favorable
1: fear 1: feasibility 1: feasible 12: feb 1: february
3: federal-industry 14: federal 1: fell 1: felt 1: few
4: final 2: finance 1: financial 2: financing 1: finding
1: findings 13: first 6: fiscal 1: five- 1: fixed-wing
1: flag 1: flash 1: flashing 1: fleets 1: flew
14: flight 4: flights 2: fly 1: flying 2: following
1: foot 80: for 12: force 2: forces 3: foreign
1: form 2: formal 3: formally 1: former 1: formulate
1: formulating 2: found 3: foundation 5: four 1: fourth
1: frame 7: france 1: french-anglo-united 1: french 26: from
1: fuel 2: full-scale 1: full 2: fully 2: functions
3: funds 1: further 3: future 1: gathered 2: gave
2: gen 12: general 2: generated 1: give 2: go
3: gordon 4: government 1: governmental 1: graduated 1: grandfather
1: granted 1: granting 1: greatest 2: grounds 1: group--headed
11: group 1: groups 1: guardia 2: guidance 1: h
27: had 7: halaby 1: hand 1: handled 1: happ
1: harm 1: have 1: hazard 11: he 2: head
3: headed 1: hearings 3: held 3: help 1: henceforth
1: high-altitude 3: high 2: highest 14: his 1: hodges
3: holding 2: honor 1: horizontal 5: hours 1: house-
4: house 7: however 1: humans 1: i 1: identical
1: identifying 1: if 1: iia--a 1: iia 1: iib
3: iic 5: iii 1: illegal 3: immediate 5: impact
1: important 1: imposed 1: imposing 1: improving 98: in
1: include 8: included 3: including 1: increase 1: increasing
1: independently 1: indicating 1: individual 1: individuals 5: industry
1: influences 3: information 1: initial 1: initiate 2: installed
1: integrated 1: intended 1: intense 1: intensities 3: intensity
1: intensive 1: intention 1: interdepartmental 2: interest 1: interim
1: intermediary 2: international 11: into 1: investment--up 1: involving
1: irreconcilable 3: issued 1: issues 14: it 19: its
1: j 2: james 27: jan 1: janeiro 2: jersey
6: jet 3: jets 2: jewell 2: john 9: johnson
1: joined 4: joint 1: jointly 1: jr 1: judgment
15: jul 1: july 21: jun 3: justified 9: kennedy
1: kennedys 2: kingdom 1: known 1: la 4: land
2: landing 1: largely 1: late 4: later 2: launched
3: layer 1: leaders 3: leadership 1: least 1: left
2: legislation 1: less 1: letter 2: level 3: levels
2: lieu 1: light 1: lighting 2: lights 1: limit
5: limited 2: line 2: lines 1: linked 1: little
1: live 4: lockheed 2: logistics 1: london-bahrain 3: london
2: long 1: loss 1: lost 2: loudness 1: low
1: lower 1: luther 2: lyndon 3: m 4: mach
12: made 1: magruder 1: maiden 1: mainland 2: maintaining
1: maintenance 3: major 2: make 6: management 1: manner
1: manufactured 3: manufacturer 11: manufacturers 13: mar 1: markers
1: market 1: markets 1: marking 1: mass 1: material
1: materiel 1: mathieson 1: matters 2: maximum 2: maxwell
12: may 1: mccone 7: mckee 1: mckees 1: mcnamara
1: meanwhile 2: measurable 1: mechanic 1: mechanical 1: mechanics
1: meet 4: meeting 1: members 1: membership 1: met
1: methods 1: might 1: miles 3: military 13: million
1: ministry 1: minute 5: minutes 1: mixed 1: mock-ups
1: model 2: modifications 1: modified 2: money 1: monitor
2: monitoring 6: month 2: months 1: more 4: most
1: move 1: mph 1: much 1: n 1: najeeb
1: name 1: nasa-usaf 7: nasa 1: nasas 9: national
1: navigation 1: need 1: needs 1: negotiation 1: neither
1: never 20: new 1: newark 1: newer 1: night
2: nixon 2: nm 6: no 9: noise 1: nominated
1: nomination 1: noncompetitive 1: noncontributing 2: nondiscriminatory 1: nor
1: normally 1: north 12: not 1: notified 1: noting
7: nov 1: november 2: number 2: objectives 1: observance
8: oct 191: of 1: off 4: office 1: officer
2: officials 5: oklahoma 1: older 1: olin 72: on
1: one-year 2: one 4: only 2: opened 4: operating
3: operation 8: operations 2: operator 2: opposition 5: or
2: order 3: organization 1: organizational 1: original 1: orval
1: osborne 3: other 3: out 1: outgoing 8: over
3: overall 1: overcome 1: overflights 5: overpressure 1: oversee
1: oversight 1: overweight 5: ozone 1: paper 1: paris-rio
3: paris 1: part 1: participation 2: passed 2: passenger
1: path 1: paths 1: paying 3: payload 1: payments
1: penalties 2: pending 1: people 4: per 2: perceived
6: percent 1: perform 3: performance 6: period 1: permanent
1: permission 1: permit 1: persuade 20: phase 2: phases
1: phenomena 1: phenomenon 1: physiological 1: pilots 1: places
3: plan 1: planes 1: planned 1: plans 1: pm
1: point 1: policy 2: polled 2: pollution 1: poor
6: port 4: position 4: positions 1: possibility 1: possible
1: post 1: postponed 2: potential 4: pounds 1: powerful
1: practicable 4: pratt 1: prepare 1: prepared 1: preproduction
1: prerogatives 17: president 7: presidents 2: previous 1: previously
1: primary 1: priorities 1: priority 2: private 1: pro-sst
1: probably 1: procedures 4: proceed 1: proceeding 1: procurement
7: production 51: program 1: programs--to 3: programs 1: prohibited
1: prohibition 3: project 1: prolonged 1: prolonging 1: prominent
1: prompt 1: property 1: proportion 1: proposal 5: proposals
5: proposed 1: proposing 1: protection 1: protests 12: prototype
2: prototypes 4: provide 3: provided 2: providing 1: provision
6: public 1: published 1: purchased 1: purchasers 1: purchases
1: purely 1: pursue 1: put 1: quesada 2: r
1: raised 3: range 1: ranged 1: rank 2: rate
1: rating 1: ratio 1: reach 1: reached 2: reaction
1: realistic 4: reasonable 1: recast 2: received 1: recent
1: recently-ended 6: recommendations 7: recommended 1: reconnaissance 1: recover
1: reduce 1: refused 2: regional 1: regularly 1: regulations
3: related 1: relationship 2: released 1: releasing 1: reliability
1: remained 1: remaining 1: replace 1: replaced 12: report
1: reported 1: representative 3: representatives 1: represented 5: request
2: requested 1: requests 3: required 1: requirements 1: requiring
10: research 1: reservation 1: reserving 1: residents 2: resigned
1: resolution 1: responding 2: response 1: responsibilities 4: responsibility
2: responsible 1: rest 1: restored 1: restricted 2: restrictions
1: resulted 1: resulting 3: results 2: ret 1: retained
2: retaining 1: retirement 1: retroactive 1: retrofit 1: reverse
4: review 1: reviewed 1: revive 2: rfp 1: right
1: rights 1: rio 1: rising 3: risk 1: risks
1: roads 1: robert 2: role 1: roles 1: room
1: royalty 3: rule 2: ruled 1: rules 1: ruling
1: run 1: s 3: safety 1: said 2: same
2: sands 1: schedule 4: scheduled 1: science 3: sciences
1: scores 2: second 15: secretary 53: see 1: seeking
1: seen 2: select 4: selected 3: selection 1: selections
7: senate 1: sent 15: sep 1: separate 1: separately
1: sequentially 1: series 1: serious 1: served 8: service
1: serving 1: setback 1: several 1: share 3: should
1: show 1: showed 2: signed 1: significantly 1: simultaneous
1: six- 2: six-month 3: six 1: sixteen 1: slowly
1: small 1: snarling 1: so 3: some 12: sonic
4: sound 1: sources 2: soviet 3: space 1: special
1: specifications 3: speed 1: spend 1: spherical 1: spring
1: square 1: sr-71 63: sst 2: ssts 3: staff
2: stage 2: standard 4: standards 1: stanley 2: star
4: state 3: stated 1: statement 8: states 1: statute
1: steel-bodied 3: steering 1: step 1: stratosphere 1: struck
2: structurally 4: structures 3: studies 9: study 1: subject
2: subjected 1: subjective 1: submission 4: submit 7: submitted
1: subsequent 3: subsequently 5: subsonic 1: substantiated 1: succeeded
2: succeeding 7: such 1: sud 1: suffered 1: suggested
1: suggestions 1: suit 1: summary 1: summer 1: superior
69: supersonic 1: supplemental 1: supplementary 6: support 1: supported
2: supreme 1: surface 1: surrounding 1: swearing-in 1: sweep-wing
1: swept-wing 1: system 1: systems 2: t 1: tactical-strike-
1: tail 5: take 1: takeoff 1: takeoffs 2: task
1: tasks 5: team 4: technical 1: technological 1: technologically
1: temporary 2: ten 2: terminated 1: termination 1: terms
2: territorial 5: test 2: testing 3: tests 1: than
46: that 425: the 5: their 1: then 6: these
3: they 1: third 17: this 1: thorough 2: those
1: three-month 8: three 2: through 1: throughout 8: time
4: times 1: timetable 1: title 141: to 1: too
2: took 1: top-priority 1: topic 1: total 1: toulouse
1: traffic 1: trail 1: transfer 3: transferred 3: transmission
1: transmitting 63: transport 9: transportation 4: transports 1: treasury
1: treatment 4: trial 1: triggered 1: tsr-2 2: tu-144
2: tupolev 1: turbofan 2: turbojet 1: two-month 11: two
1: typical 1: unable 1: unconvinced 5: under 1: unions
1: unit 9: united 1: unlighted 1: unlike 1: unprofitable
1: unreasonable 1: unsold 1: unsound 2: until 1: unveiled
2: up 1: upheld 2: upon 1: upper 28: us
3: usaf 2: used 1: useful 1: using 1: va
1: value 3: variable-sweep-wing 2: variable-sweep 2: variable 1: variety
1: varying 1: very 3: vice 1: view 1: views
1: virtual 3: volpe 3: vote 2: voted 1: walls
1: warranted 41: was 4: washington 2: waters 2: way
1: weather 1: webb 1: weeks 1: weight-payload 2: weight
1: well 1: went 10: were 1: west 1: wests
8: when 1: whether 18: which 4: while 3: white
4: whitney 2: who 5: william 1: windows 2: wing
3: winners 21: with 1: within 1: without 1: wording
1: worked 2: working 3: world 2: worlds 27: would
1: wrote 2: xb-70 1: xb-70a 3: year 3: years
9: york

Accessed Unique Words: 1386


Accessed Patterns Found Hide

Number Sort
202 training 163 radar 156 tower 132 research 130 weather 125 terminal
122 navigation 106 radio 101 computer 86 installation 73 installed 72 Terminal
69 Research 67 en route 57 satellite 47 voice 46 Radar 44 TRACON
39 software 38 Weather 37 Automation 33 Training 27 ads 27 ADS
26 En Route 25 Ocean 25 Navigation 24 ADS-B 21 flight service stations 21 hijacking
21 automation 19 ocean 19 navigation aids 17 Curtis 17 air defense 17 Air Defense
16 STARS 16 oceanic 15 data link 15 FSS 15 Radio 14 navigational
13 WAAS 13 Oceanic 13 Stage A 13 Voice 12 Computer 11 Installation
10 installations 9 Tower 9 hijacked 8 installing 8 SAGE 8 NAFEC
7 navigational aids 7 FAA Technical Center 7 ADIZ 7 navaid 7 sequestration 6 hijackers
6 Flight Service Stations 6 hijackings 6 ATCRBS 5 design competition 5 conflict alert 5 simulation
5 terrorists 4 Flow Control 4 navigator 4 MSAW 4 ADs 4 AAS
4 privatization 3 Minimum Safe Altitude Warning 3 navigate 3 multilateration 3 restricted airspace 3 DABS
3 hijacker 3 Satellite 3 VSCS 2 Multilateration 2 Installing 2 Curtis report
2 NADIN 2 World Trade Center 2 minimum safe altitude warning 2 navigable 2 ADSB 2 Hijacking
2 restricted areas 2 datalink 2 Datalink 2 flow control 1 oceans 1 Aug 22, 1938:
1 shrimp boats 1 Ocean21 1 Jul 7, 1964: 1 privatize 1 May 21, 1958: 1 Flight service stations
1 navigational aide 1 Oct 1, 1958: 1 Navigating 1 manual radar 1 Aug 23, 1958: 1 BRITE
1 navigators 1 AERA 1 May 20, 1926: 1 Data Link 1 metering 1 manually operated
1 enroute 1 NAVAID 1 TBFM 1 Apr 1, 1964: 1 Navigator 1 TFDM
1 conflict probe 1 installer 1 February 3, 2016: 1 May 20, 1964:

Alpha Sort
7 ADIZ 26 En Route 11 Installation 2 Installing 2 NADIN 3 VSCS
67 en route 1 enroute 86 installation 10 installations 73 installed 1 installer
8 installing 4 AAS 1 Apr 1, 1964: 1 Aug 22, 1938: 1 Aug 23, 1958: 15 FSS
1 February 3, 2016: 6 Flight Service Stations 1 Flight service stations 1 Jul 7, 1964: 1 May 20, 1926: 1 May 20, 1964:
1 May 21, 1958: 1 Oct 1, 1958: 13 Stage A 21 flight service stations 3 Satellite 13 WAAS
57 satellite 2 Curtis report 17 Curtis 7 FAA Technical Center 4 MSAW 3 Minimum Safe Altitude Warning
8 NAFEC 46 Radar 5 conflict alert 2 minimum safe altitude warning 163 radar 12 Computer
44 TRACON 13 Voice 101 computer 1 manual radar 1 manually operated 3 restricted airspace
2 restricted areas 1 shrimp boats 47 voice 39 software 4 Flow Control 1 NAVAID
1 Navigating 25 Navigation 1 Navigator 2 flow control 7 navaid 2 navigable
3 navigate 19 navigation aids 122 navigation 1 navigational aide 7 navigational aids 14 navigational
4 navigator 1 navigators 15 Radio 16 STARS 2 World Trade Center 106 radio
5 terrorists 1 AERA 1 Data Link 2 Datalink 69 Research 1 TBFM
1 TFDM 1 conflict probe 15 data link 2 datalink 5 design competition 1 metering
132 research 6 ATCRBS 3 DABS 2 Multilateration 38 Weather 3 multilateration
4 privatization 1 privatize 7 sequestration 130 weather 24 ADS-B 27 ADS
2 ADSB 4 ADs 27 ads 17 Air Defense 1 BRITE 8 SAGE
9 Tower 17 air defense 156 tower 37 Automation 2 Hijacking 1 Ocean21
25 Ocean 13 Oceanic 72 Terminal 33 Training 21 automation 9 hijacked
3 hijacker 6 hijackers 21 hijacking 6 hijackings 19 ocean 16 oceanic
1 oceans 5 simulation 125 terminal 202 training

Accessed Patterns Not Found

\bSST\b supersonic.transportautomation
FAATC Mode-s privatiz\w+terminal MLAT SBS clearance delivery
TSAS


Metrics Hide

Save Metrics with analysis run all-history.txt 05/28/017 10:31:19 Appended Metrics File

Total Lines: 4123
Blank Lines: 3
Non Blank Lines: 4120
Imperatives: 71
Shalls: 8
Wills: 69
IsReq:

Message: These metrics are what allow you to compare different documents and different analysis runs. Consider moving the numbers into a spreadsheet for visualization. Counts of Shalls, Wills, IsReq, and Imperatives are hardcoded into the tool. You have the ability to enter a Norm value, which can be surfaced after multiple analysis sessions.

Item Risk Count Children % lines % imperative % shall % will % isreq % Norm
AAS s4s

ADIZ s4s

ADS s9s

Advanced Automation s9s

Air Defense s4s

Automation s4s

Beacon RADAR s4s

Communications s9s

Computer s4s

Curtis Report s4s

Design Competition s4s

Early Automation s9s

En Route s9s

Flight Service s9s

Flow Control s9s

Hijack s4s

Install s4s

Manual System s9s

Multilateration s9s

NAFEC s4s

NAS Stage A s4s

Navigation s9s

Oceanic s9s

RADAR s9s

RADIO s9s

Research s4s

Restricted Areas s4s

SAGE s4s

STARS s4s

Satellite s9s

Search rta

45

1.09

63.38

65.21

Shutdown s4s

Simulation Training s9s

Software s4s

Startup s4s

TRACON s9s

Terminal s9s

Terrorist s4s

Tower s9s

Voice s9s

Weather s9s

z Mined Objects

45

1.09

63.38

65.21

Rules Total 42
Rules Triggered 2
Rules Not Triggered 40
Percent of Rules Triggered 4%

Reading Level Hide

Disabling the noise filter may reduce the reading level. Re-run the report to capture metrics for both instances.

Accessed Unique Words: 1386
Accessed Unique Syllables: 3015
Words with 3+ Syllables: 535
Polysyllabic Count: 3
Reading Level: 5

Document Shape Hide

The number of children at a particular level translate to a document shape. There are diffrent document shapes and each have implications. The document shapes are: random, rectangle, pyramid, inverted pyramid, trapazoid and diamond.

There are no child counts. Try disabling all services except for the service that has checked: Count Accessed Words.

Services and Triggered Rule Comments Hide

General Search: Use this service to perform general searches. If you find something that should be established as a new service or rule use add them to your template.

. . . 1. Search Take a look at the accessed words and see if you gain further insight into your search.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Search Color: RED Access Object: \bSST\b|supersonic.transport Count Accessed Words: CHECKED

Topics of Interest: Think of this as your highlighter pen or a really advanced search engine option.

. . . 1. AAS No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: AAS Color: BROWN Access Object: \bAAS\b Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 2. ADIZ No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: ADIZ Color: BLUE Access Object: ADIZ Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 3. Air Defense No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Air Defense Color: PURPLE Access Object: Air Defense Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 4. Automation No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Automation Color: RED Access Object: automation Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 5. Beacon RADAR No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Beacon RADAR Color: ORANGE Access Object: ATCRBS|Mode-s|DABS Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 6. Computer No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Computer Color: GREEN Access Object: computer Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 7. Curtis Report No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Curtis Report Color: FUCSHIA Access Object: Curtis report|Curtis Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 8. Design Competition No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Design Competition Color: OLIVE Access Object: Design Competition Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 9. Hijack No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Hijack Color: RED Access Object: Hijack\w+ Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 10. Install No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Install Color: BLUE Access Object: install\w+ Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 11. NAFEC No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: NAFEC Color: FUCSHIA Access Object: NAFEC|FAATC|FAA Technical Center Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 12. NAS Stage A No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: NAS Stage A Color: BROWN Case Sensitive : CHECKED Access Object: Stage.A Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 13. Research No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Research Color: OLIVE Access Object: research Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 14. Restricted Areas No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Restricted Areas Color: GREEN Access Object: Restricted Area\w+|Restricted air\w+ Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 15. SAGE No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: SAGE Color: PURPLE Case Sensitive : CHECKED Access Object: SAGE Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 16. STARS No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: STARS Color: NAVY Case Sensitive : CHECKED Access Object: STARS Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 17. Shutdown No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Shutdown Color: ORANGE Access Object: Seques\w+|privatiz\w+ Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 18. Software No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Software Color: MAROON Case Sensitive : CHECKED Access Object: software Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 19. Startup No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Startup Color: BROWN Access Object: May 20, 1926:|Aug 22, 1938:|May 21, 1958:|Aug 23, 1958:|Oct 1, 1958:|Apr 1, 1964:|May 20, 1964:|Jul 7, 1964:|Feb\w+ 3, 2016: Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 20. Terrorist No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Terrorist Color: NAVY Access Object: terrorist\w+|world trade center Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

FAA Systems Services:

. . . 1. ADS No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: ADS Color: Olive Access Object: ADS|ADSB|ADS-B Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 2. Advanced Automation No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Advanced Automation Color: OLIVE Access Object: conflict probe|metering|clearance delivery|AERA|TBFM|TFDM|TSAS|datalink|data link Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 3. Communications No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Communications Color: BLUE Access Object: VSCS|NADIN|SBS Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 4. Early Automation No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Early Automation Color: FUCSHIA Access Object: conflict alert|minimum safe altitude warning|MSAW Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 5. En Route No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: En Route Color: BLUE Access Object: EnRoute|En Route Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 6. Flight Service No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Flight Service Color: BROWN Access Object: flight service stations|FSS Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 7. Flow Control No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Flow Control Color: Maroon Access Object: flow control Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 8. Manual System No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Manual System Color: GREEN Access Object: manually operated|manual RADAR|shrimp boat\w* Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 9. Multilateration No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Multilateration Color: ORANGE Access Object: MLAT|multilateration Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 10. Navigation No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Navigation Color: Maroon Access Object: navig\w+|navaid|nav\w+ aid\w Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 11. Oceanic No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Oceanic Color: RED Access Object: ocean\w+|ocean Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 12. RADAR No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: RADAR Color: FUCSHIA Access Object: RADAR Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 13. RADIO No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: RADIO Color: NAVY Access Object: radio Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 14. Satellite No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Satellite Color: Brown Access Object: Satellite|WAAS Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 15. Simulation Training No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Simulation Training Color: RED Access Object: simulation|training Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 16. TRACON No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: TRACON Color: GREEN Access Object: TRACON Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 17. Terminal No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Terminal Color: RED Access Object: terminal Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 18. Tower No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Tower Color: PURPLE Access Object: Tower|BRITE Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 19. Voice No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Voice Color: GREEN Access Object: voice Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 20. Weather No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: Weather Color: ORANGE Access Object: weather Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

original processing URL http://localhost:4444/~gda/satpro.cgi v 1.6 p

10:31:19 Start Time
10:31:30 End Time
11 Seconds

5.008006 satpro pid: 4084 C:/Windows httpd pid:2096 error pid: 4036