If this is a template Press Submit first

General Document Analysis

Documents
Templates
History

Help
REs
Training

Policy Document Analysis

There are many ways to approach problems. This service identifies the emphasis of various approaches. It is based on the fundamental process of state the problem, identify current approaches, state what is wrong with the current approaches, identify alternatives, tradeoff the alternatives, and pick the most effective alternative. This is all under the framework of seeking truth. Consider using other templates: Constitutional, Legislation, Plain Language, and even Screen Plays.

ReStart Default Rules No Rules

Prior to uploading your file, set your report options.
Also check the rules and modify them as desired.

      Stop Now

1. select browse, go to z-cassbeth/gda/documents
2. pick any.txt document
3. select a service, press submit, review results
4. go thru each service one at a time
5. select browse, pick another document
6. compare the results
7. update and create new rules and templates
. . . These template instructions are user defined.
Sustainable Development Possible with Creative System Engineering buy from amazon.com
Book Information
Previously Uploaded File: Project-2025_MFL_FULL-SpecialCharFix.txt

Analysis Settings Hide

PUI Mask
Imperatives
Process Only Imperatives


Parse Text Show Rules
Strip HTML Tags
Strip Blank Lines
Show Processed Upload
Report Areas Hide
Analysis Results
Accessed Words
Accessed Patterns
Metrics

Doc Shape
Reading Level
Comments

Services and Rules

Template Comments Policy Document Analysis

1. Search
2. Find Duplicate Objects
3. Reading Level
4. Word Themes
5. Broad Approaches
6. Institutions
7. Societal Approaches
8. Organizational Tools
9. Nation State Tools
10. International Tools
11. Social Warnings
12. National Roles
13. International Roles
14. Special Interests
15. Emotions
16. Overall Reaction
17. Retirees
18. Government Changes
19. Corporations Deregulation
20. Health
21. Taxpayer Needs
22. Classism
23. Needs
24. Sections
25. Immigration
26. NSF Show Search Show Simple Rules Show Complex Rules
. . .
1. NSF 2. National Science Foundation

Add New Service Name Remove Last Service: NSF


Analysis Results Hide

Filter case sensitive
Access Object Reject Object Access Risk

Show Checkboxes Show Comment Details Show All Comments Hide Checked Items Save Results . File

Processing previously uploaded file in Project-2025_MFL_FULL-SpecialCharFix.txt

Parsed the text during analysis. You may need to upload the file again to match the PUIs.


Parsed the text in uploaded FILE into complete thoughts using the period punctuation. Stripped extra spaces and line feeds.

1. GDA-6109 If Congress believes the federal government can play a valuable research role, those research centers can be moved to the National Science Foundation. .

2. GDA-6680 Before the start of a new Administration, there should be a review of all the federal science agencies.12 This should include a review of the ill-advised attempt to expand the National Science Foundation's mission from supporting university research to supporting an all-encompassing technology transition. .

3. GDA-7221 12. Including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, etc. .

Processed Entire File


Accessed Words Hide

Filter Noise Words

No results to report.

Accessed Patterns Found Hide

Number Sort
3 National Science Foundation

Alpha Sort
3 National Science Foundation

Accessed Patterns Not Found
(or counted via checkbox setting)

NSF


Metrics Hide

Save Metrics with analysis run Project-2025_MFL_FULL-SpecialCharFix.txt 07/30/024 11:37:18 Appended Metrics File

Total Lines: 15842
Blank Lines:
Non Blank Lines: 15842
Imperatives: 539
Shalls: 31
Wills: 519
IsReq:

Message: These metrics are what allow you to compare different documents and different analysis runs. Consider moving the numbers into a spreadsheet for visualization. Counts of Shalls, Wills, IsReq, and Imperatives are hardcoded into the tool. You have the ability to enter a Norm value, which can be surfaced after multiple analysis sessions.

Item Risk Count Children % lines % imperative % shall % will % isreq % Norm
NSF s26s

National Science Foundation s26s

3

0.01

0.55

9.67

0.57

z Mined Objects

3

0.01

0.55

9.67

0.57

Rules Total 3
Rules Triggered 2
Rules Not Triggered 1
Percent of Rules Triggered 66%

Reading Level Hide

Disabling the noise filter may reduce the reading level. Re-run the report to capture metrics for both instances.

Accessed Unique Words:
Accessed Unique Syllables:
Words with 3+ Syllables:
Polysyllabic Count: 0
Reading Level: No reading level is available. Select any rule option and check: Count Accessed Words or use a Reading Level Service which has checked: Count Accessed Words.

Document Shape Hide

The number of children at a particular level translate to a document shape. There are diffrent document shapes and each have implications. The document shapes are: random, rectangle, pyramid, inverted pyramid, trapazoid and diamond.

There are no child counts. Try disabling all services except for the service that has checked: Count Accessed Words.

Services and Triggered Rule Comments Hide

NSF:

. . . 1. NSF No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: NSF Color: RED Case Sensitive : CHECKED Access Object: NSF Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

. . . 2. National Science Foundation No Comment Text in this rule.
. . . . . . Rule Summary Name: National Science Foundation Color: GREEN Access Object: National Science Foundation Count Accessed Patterns: CHECKED

original processing URL http://localhost:4444/~gda/satpro.cgi v 1.7 p

11:37:18 Start Time
11:37:23 End Time
5 Seconds

5.008006 satpro pid: 3380 C:/Windows httpd pid:6012 error pid: 9208